Home > Philippines
Police tell one story of drug killing, videos tell another
Children attend the wake of Rolando Arellano Campo and Sherwin Bitas inside a house two days after they were killed in a police operation captured on CCTV, in Tondo, Manila on October 13, 2017. (REUTERS/Dondi Tawatao/Files | Manila Bulletin)
November 29th, 2017 | 09:33 AM | 1010 views
Barangay 19, Manila
The police report was clear. Anti-drug officers shot and wounded three men in this poor Manila district and “rushed” them to a hospital where they were pronounced dead on arrival.
But security camera footage obtained by Reuters tells a different story of what happened just after midday on October 11 here. It shows that police took at least 25 minutes to haul away the men they had shot. The victims show no signs of life; police are seen carrying them by their arms and legs and loading their limp bodies onto pedicabs to take them to hospital.
The footage casts new doubts on the official accounts of police killings in President Duterte’s 17-month war against drugs.
In June, Reuters revealed that police have shot hundreds of people during anti-drug operations, then taken them to hospitals where they are declared dead on arrival. Police say they’re trying to save lives. Bereaved relatives and other witnesses allege police are sending corpses to hospitals to disrupt crime scenes and cover up extrajudicial killings.
Police have shot dead at least 3,900 people in anti-narcotic operations since Duterte took power in June 2016 – always in self-defense, police say. Human rights activists blame police for thousands more killings attributed to vigilantes, but authorities deny any involvement.
A witness to the Barangay 19 killings told Reuters that the three men were executed and not, as the police claim, shot in self-defense. Police say they only use deadly force in self-defense, but a series of investigations by Reuters suggest they are summarily executing people.
The report said Rolando Campo, 60, sold drugs to an undercover officer, who signaled for back-up. Campo “sensed the presence” of the police officers and ordered his two associates – Sherwin Bitas, 34, and Ronnie Cerbito, 18 – to draw their guns and open fire on them, the report said.
The police retaliated, leaving the three men “fatally wounded,” it said.
But the footage shows Campo chatting with people in the neighborhood in the minutes before the police arrive, and not, as the report said, selling drugs to an undercover officer.
The security camera footage not only contradicts the police account of the Barangay 19 killings. It also provides further evidence of another drug-war tactic: the disabling of surveillance cameras at crime scenes by the police. In the footage, filmed simultaneously by four security cameras, an officer is seen turning the camera that captured the action away from the scene.
The police understand the dangers posed by such footage, which can expose their actions. An active-duty commander involved in the drug war told Reuters earlier this year that police collude with local officials to unplug security cameras in areas where they plan to carry out a drug-war killing.
Reuters has obtained footage from all four security cameras, each capturing the episode from a different angle. Together, the cameras provide a unique record of a police operation from start to finish.
“The operation was legitimate,” said Superintendent Santiago Pascual, the commander of the station that conducted the raid, in a statement to Reuters. A station investigation showed that his officers had followed correct operational procedure, said Pascual, and eyewitness testimony that they had opened fire on unarmed men was “untrue and unfounded.”
Police carried out the Oct. 11 raid a day after Duterte ordered them to leave anti-drug operations to the state-run Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency. The October memo marked the second time that Duterte has publicly told police officers to stop waging his drug war.
In the video footage, at least 15 armed policemen were seen clearing an area in Tondo, Manila before the three drug suspects were reportedly shot dead.
Philippine National Police (PNP) chief Director General Ronald dela Rosa said, “I have not seen the video footage. There will be no cover up on this.” But two days after the incident, dela Rosa absolved the policemen involved in the Tondo buy-bust of any wrong doing. Dela Rosa said the cops were not at fault because “the executive order of the President has not yet reached them when the operation was conducted.”
Manila Police District director Chief Superintendent Joel Napoleon Coronel also insists it was a legitimate operation.
“It was a high-risk police operations conducted in Tondo against three suspected drug traffickers reported to be armed and dangerous. Precisely why our police operatives took the necessary precautions to secure the area while conducting police operations,” said Coronel.
The police operation doesn’t seem to be undercover. The footage shows mainly plainclothes officers, most of them visibly armed and some wearing body armor, entering the area through the alley on which Campo and Bitas lived. The officers pass in full view of the victims’ house seven minutes before the shooting starts.
Arlene Gibaga, Bitas’ wife, told Reuters that she witnessed the shooting and the three men were unarmed. “We don’t have the money for guns,” said Gibaga, who has three young children with Bitas. She said her husband didn’t deal drugs.
Police detained the men in an alley next to her house, she said, and asked her to get Bitas’ ID. When she produced it, said Gibaga, one officer shouted “Positive! Positive!” and then the officers fired on Bitas.
“Don’t do that to my husband!” she screamed, as the police shot Bitas. “I will report you! There are CCTV cameras here!”
One of the officers then aimed his gun at Gibaga and ordered her inside, she said.
The footage doesn’t show the police shooting the three men, but does show an officer appearing to open fire on an unseen target. Campo then falls backwards into the frame, his body hitting the ground. His arms move for a while before resting motionless.
Less than a minute later, the camera that captured the scene of the shooting is effectively put out of action: someone turns it to face the wall. A second camera shows a police officer reaching up and turning it away.
Station commander Pascual said the camera was averted for a “valid security reason” and to ensure the operation wasn’t compromised. His statement reiterated the police report’s version of events – “that the suspects first drew firearms and shot the operatives,” who returned fire in self-defense.
Later that day, at Police Station 2, Gibaga said officers told her it was useless to complain. “It’s the government you will be fighting against,” she recalled one officer saying. “Don’t get angry at us. We are just following orders.” (With a report from Aaron B. Recuenco)
courtesy of MANILA BULLETIN
If you have any stories or news that you would like to share with the global online community, please feel free to share it with us by contacting us directly at email@example.com