The High Court has granted Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) for his 47 graft charges.

The charges were brought against him by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) in connection with alleged misuse of funds regarding his charitable foundation Yayasan Akalbudi (YAB).

Justice Datuk Collin Lawrence Sequerah in his judgment yesterday made the decision after considering both arguments by the prosecution and the defence team.

Earlier, the prosecution had applied for Ahmad Zahid to be discharged but not acquitted, as further investigations are still needed for the case.

Deputy public prosecutor Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar listed 11 reasons for it; these include ensuring that no miscarriage of justice is committed and to make way for more comprehensive investigations by the authorities.

Justice Sequerah in his judgment said that the court was placing the DNAA order as the case had been ongoing for 77 days involving a total of 114 witnesses from both prosecution and defence.

“In the premises and for the reasons given, this court placed an order to DNAA,” he ruled.

The judge said that the powers exercised by the AGC under Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution and Section 254 of the Criminal Procedure Code to institute or withdraw charges at any time before judgment was unquestioned.

He added however, that a lot of precious judicial time and taxpayer money would be wasted if the prosecution decided not to proceed with the charges in the future.

“The prosecution has invoked its powers to stop the proceedings.

“This is good for the time being, although there’s no total acquittal, there’s a discharge from the 47 charges.

“We respect the decision of his Lordship and we will respect his Lordship and make an appeal to the Court of Appeal with regards to the decision made.

“We are asking for a total acquittal,” he told the reporters after the proceeding yesterday.

Ahmad Zahid’s lawyer Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Zainal said that the AGC was only exercising its discretion as provided in the Federal Constitution when it decided to stop the charges.

He said the prosecution filing a discharge was a normal matter when the AGC could accept the reasons given by the accused through the representations given.

He also said that the cases which the Umno president was being charged with were a form of political prosecution.

“In our client’s sworn testimony in court, former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad called our client and gave instructions in a firm tone to dissolve Umno or to accept any consequences if his instructions were not obeyed.

“The meeting with Tun Mahathir was in June 2018. The client refused to submit to Tun Mahathir’s threats and on July 2, 2018, the client was called by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission for the purpose of investigation and court action.

“Our client was charged on Oct 19, 2018,” he said.

Source:
courtesy of THE STAR

by UNAID IBRAHIM and BENJAMIN LEE

If you have any stories or news that you would like to share with the global online community, please feel free to share it with us by contacting us directly at [email protected]