| Athletes need
encouragement to give best performance
The Brunei Amateur Athletics
Association had recently released a qualifying standard for
participation in international meets with the last SEA Games 2003
result and comments on athletes' performance.
We would like to know based on what
criteria was the standard was set?
1.Only two qualifying standards were
created. One standard will be used for SEA Games and another for other
international competitions.
Using one qualifying standard for all
international competition is improper as every international
championships can be categorised according to its level of
competition. e.g. Asian Track and Field Championship are competed at a
higher level than SEA Games, while another competition (e.g. BIMP-EAGA)
is competed at a lower level.
Consequently, a qualifying standard
has to be set accordingly to meet the level of each respective
international competition.
With the respective qualifying
standard, the new/lower category of athletes should be given
opportunity to compete in lower-level competition in the region, while
middle category of athletes compete in middle-level competition, and
the elite athletes should be given priority to compete in higher-level
competition.
Each category of athletes should be
given an opportunity to compete in its respective class of
international championship.
2. Standard set is not consistent
between events. If the last 22nd SEA Games 2003 result is used as the
basis for setting the qualifying standard for SEA Games 2005, it can
be concluded that there is no consistency.
For instance, the time mark from the
7th rank is used to set the qualifying standard for 100 m women; while
in 1,500 m men, a time mark which is far beyond the 1st rank is set as
the qualifying standard.
3. Athletes being condemned because
of age. It is true that there are athletes who are in their 30's. This
should not mean they are not qualified to compete.
Currently, some of them are still
among the best performers in their respective event. In an open
competition, how can age be a criteria for competing.
There is no international rule,
ruling that any athlete of age above 30 shall not be entitled to
compete in an open championship. Is it not the results that matter the
most?
4. An error by 2 seconds means a
major difference in a fast track event, and especially when this is
used to compare and evaluate an athlete performance. Why are the
result for rank 7th and 8th in 1,500 m not revealed when time mark
from the 8th rank should be used for selection of athletes?
With these current qualifying
standards, it means no athlete is qualified to compete in any
competition; neither SEA Games, nor any other international
competition.
How has the association helped
athletes to meet the qualifying standard when there is no support from
the association?
Why are we not abiding by the
decision of the Brunei National Olympic Council to use the mark set at
the minimum of the 8th placing from the last SEA Games as the
qualifying standard?
Except for one or two
events/athletes, the current performance of other events/athletes may
not meet the medal contention in the SEA Games.
So, what is the association doing at
present to boost athletes motivation and performance and in developing
athletics in Brunei?
All the years that I have been an
athlete, I have never athletes getting any moral support.
In the past some athletes have been
hurt and unmotivated and sadly it still goes on even to this day.
- Disheartened Athlete |