|
Exercising may reduce lung cancer
risk
By KATHY MATHESON
Philadelphia
- Everyone knows smoking is a bad idea, but those who can't
give it up may get a little protection from exercise, a study
suggests. In a study of older women, researchers found that a
physically active smoker had a 35 percent lower risk of lung cancer
than a sedentary smoker.
Even so, one expert called that
reduction trivial because smoking itself is so risky. And Dr.
Kathryn Schmitz, the study's lead author, stressed that exercising
does not give women a free pass to smoke.
"The most important thing that
smokers can do to reduce the risk of lung cancer is quit smoking,"
said Schmitz, an assistant professor at the University of
Pennsylvania's Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics.
Those who quit smoking are 10 to 11
times less likely to develop lung cancer than those who smoke, she
said.
The research, published in this
month's issue of Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, was
based on information from the Iowa Women's Health Study. That
project began in 1986 to follow nearly 42,000 older women. The women
filled out health questionnaires over the years, including
information about their smoking status and physical activity.
By the end of 2002, the data
included 36,410 participants, and 777 had lung cancer.
Of those, 125 were non-smokers, 177
were former smokers, and 475 were current smokers.
Schmitz, who was then at the
University of Minnesota's School of Public Health, worked with four
colleagues to analyze the data.
Among smokers, the greatest number
of cancer cases, 324, came from women who currently smoked and
weren't very active. Among physically active smokers, there were 151
cases of lung cancer.
The greatest benefits went to those
who had quit smoking and also exercised, with just 82 cancer cases
compared to 95 in sedentary former smokers.
Among the exercisers, the lowest
risk of lung cancer was found in those who had moderate workouts
more than four times a week, or vigorous workouts two or more times
a week.
It is still unclear why physical
activity might have a preventive effect on lung cancer. Studies over
the years have produced conflicting results on that subject.
Researchers say it could be that improved pulmonary function reduces
both the concentration of carcinogenic particles and the extent to
which they are deposited in the lungs.
Also, being more physically active
could make smokers more aware of the damage they have caused their
lungs — leading them to smoke less or quit, Schmitz said.
Dr. Norman Edelman, chief medical
officer for the American Lung Association, echoed Schmitz's comments
that the report should not give physically active female smokers "a
false sense of security."
"We don't want people to get the
wrong message," Edelman said. "A regular smoker has a risk of lung
cancer 10 times that of a nonsmoker, and 35 percent reduction in
that risk is trivial."
He noted the study does not address
the effect of exercise on other smoking-related health problems,
such as emphysema and heart disease. He also said that because the
active women were less likely to be overweight, it was unclear if
the lower lung cancer rate was a result of their exercising or their
weight. Some cancers are more common in the obese, Edelman said. --
The
Associated Press
Click
Here To Have Your Say On This Story
Brudirect.com News
|